This post was originally published on http://itproafrica.com
CAS Array’s may be a bit confusing
What are they
What do you call them?
Do CAS Array names need to be included in your certificate names
- What about load balancers
What are they?
A CAS array is a logical Grouping of CAS servers within an AD site represented by a single DNS name, and not much more. Creating a CAS array doesn’t switch on a bit of magic and client requests stat heading to the CAS array automatically – what it DOES do, is create a logical – note logical – grouping of CAS servers – the physical grouping still needs to be achieved using a load balancing mechanism of some sort.
What do you call them?
It depends. You don’t want to call you array a name that you can reach from the outside – like mail.company.com – why? Outlook will expect to create an RPC (MAPI) connection to mail.company.com and fail. CAS Arrays don’t have much significance in your name space planning from the outside, so call them something that makes sense from a name space perspective from the inside.
What about names on the certificate?
So you’ve created your CAS array, and now you want to rush out and buy a certificate for it. But why would you want to do that? MAPI doesn’t require a certificate. If you have internal services like OWA or OA (RPC over HTTP) that connect via an internal load balanced name, then it may make sense to add the name on a certificate, however that may be an internally trusted (note I didn’t say Exchange self signed certificate) certificate, and as such doesn't need to reflect on your external certificate.
What about load balancers?
What about them? lets go back to the previous point. If you understand what protocols you’re publishing and where you’re publishing them to then understanding if you need a load balancer or not becomes easy. Lets look at MAPI and HTTP protocols:
If you’re publishing HTTP based protocols to the outside (EWS, OWA, ECP, OA, etc) then you may be publishing those protocols and load balancing via ISA/TMG/other (“other’s” always an interesting discussion 🙂 ) There’s a few ways of satisfying the load balancing requirement depending on which client you’re balancing.
Should HTTP based clients feature in your certificate naming? Yes they should, but remember what you’re publishing and where to (inside/outside) and your certificate names may become a lot more obvious.
In summary – if all you’re doing with your CAS arrays is providing MAPI, then you don’t need a certificate, however if you’re doing ANYHTING else, like OAB, EWS, Availability Service (AS), etc, then
yes – you should have a certificate for those name spaces
no – that certificate doesn’t have to be an externally sourced certificate, but it may well be if it makes your planning easier.
so to answer the question - should your CAS array name reflect on your external certificate ? If you don’t want to roll out internal PKI (certificate) infrastructure, and you only have one site and that site is internet facing and you’re publishing http based name spaces then the answer may well be yes.
If you have more than one internet facing site, or have several load balanced names or have your own PKI, or don’t want to give away your internal name spaces – then the answer is – it depends. If the answer isn’t immediatelly obvious, then you may want to start by
- understanding the name spaces you want to address
- understand which protocols you’ll use in those name spaces
- understand if they’re internal or external facing or both
and take it from there.